Performance Engineering for Quantitative Finance

Your Python backtests are slow. Your trading system is slower. I make both fast.

Slow, unoptimized Python code isn't a technical inconvenience—it's a direct commercial cost. High iteration latency kills alpha. Cloud costs explode. I provide a structured, two-phase optimization service: an audit to identify bottlenecks, then targeted rewriting of critical paths using Polars, Rust, or GPU acceleration.

Slow code kills your alpha. Here's the proof.

Four production-grade case studies demonstrating repeatable, measurable performance gains in quantitative finance systems.

Pandas vectorization icon

Case Study 01: Pandas → Polars Backtest Vectorization

Loop-based quantitative backtest with O(T × W × N) complexity (Time × Window × Assets) migrated to fully vectorized O(T × N) implementation using Polars + NumPy hybrid. Polars handles Rust-based rolling operations, NumPy handles matrix algebra.

Measured results:

615× speedup on large datasets (3000×100). 19% lower Python memory. Strict numerical parity (tolerance <6e-8). Reduced complexity from O(T×W×N) to O(T×N).

HFT orderbook icon

Case Study 02: HFT L2 Orderbook – Ring Buffer + Bitset

HashMap-based orderbook replaced with Ring Buffer + Bitset architecture in Rust, designed for full L1 cache residency (~34 KB). Zero heap allocations in hot path. Direct addressing by price tick eliminates hash collisions and linear scans.

Measured results:

5.35× faster updates (257 ns vs 1.378 µs). 177–546× faster reads (0.56–0.83 ns vs 147–309 ns). Zero allocations = predictable latency.

FFT autocorrelation icon

Case Study 03: FFT Autocorrelation – Rust + PyO3

Native Rust module replacing SciPy's C-based FFT. Adaptive algorithm selection: O(n·k) direct method for small lags, O(n log n) Real FFT for large lags. Thread-local buffer pools eliminate malloc/free cycles. 2357-smooth FFT sizing instead of power-of-2 padding.

Measured results:

70× speedup (small datasets). 2.6–9.7× speedup (large datasets). Drop-in replacement with identical NumPy interface. Numerical accuracy <1×10⁻⁸ vs SciPy. Zero Python code changes required.

GPU Monte Carlo icon

Case Study 04: GPU Monte Carlo – NumPy → CuPy

Monte Carlo simulation for Asian option pricing offloaded from CPU (NumPy) to GPU (CuPy). Drop-in replacement with identical API. Demonstrates critical float32 vs float64 precision trade-off for GPU performance.

Measured results:

13.7× speedup (standard GPU pipeline, 500K paths × 252 steps). 42.0× speedup with zero-copy architecture. Float32 is 1.81× faster than float64 on GPU.

A productized optimization service designed for quant research and trading systems.

Profile-first approach with proven results: Polars vectorization, Rust modules via PyO3, GPU acceleration with CuPy, or cache-optimized data structures. Every optimization is benchmarked, tested for numerical parity, and production-ready.

The Two-Phase Process

A structured, repeatable methodology that delivers measurable gains without disrupting your existing infrastructure. Here's what vectorization looks like in practice:

Before: Loop-based O(T×W×N) – 35.24 seconds
# Nested loops per asset per timestep
for t in range(signal_sigma_window_size, n_obs - 1):
    sigmas = sig.iloc[t - signal_sigma_window_size:t].std()

    for j in range(n_assets):
        # Recompute same operations repeatedly
        sigma_j = sigmas.iloc[j]
        raw_signal = signal.iloc[t, j] / sigma_j

        # Apply signal filters element by element
        if raw_signal > entry_threshold:
            position[t+1, j] = 1.0
        elif raw_signal < -entry_threshold:
            position[t+1, j] = -1.0
        else:
            position[t+1, j] = 0.0

# Runtime: 35.24s for 3000 timesteps × 100 assets
After: Polars + NumPy O(T×N) – 0.057 seconds (615× faster)
# Use Polars rolling operations (Rust-based)
sigma_exprs = [
    pl.col(col)
    .rolling_std(window_size=signal_sigma_window_size)
        .shift(1) for col in signal_pl.columns
]
sigma = signal_pl.select(sigma_exprs).to_numpy()

# NumPy vectorized operations (entire matrix at once)
normed_signal = signal.to_numpy() / sigma

position_path = np.where(
    normed_signal > entry_threshold, 1.0,
    np.where(normed_signal < -entry_threshold, -1.0, 0.0)
)

# Runtime: 0.057s → Identical API, 615× speedup

Bottom line: Your quants keep writing Python. Your code runs 5–615× faster. Your cloud costs drop. Your iteration speed increases. Your alpha compounds.

A surgical, two-phase process that delivers repeatable gains.

Designed for quantitative research and trading teams who need speed without breaking existing infrastructure.

Phase 1 icon
Phase 1

Performance Audit & Diagnostic

Time-boxed Engagement (Up to 5 days) - This phase identifies and quantifies latent performance gains within your system.

You Provide:

  • Read-only codebase access
  • Representative workloads for profiling
  • A 2-3 hour technical onboarding session

You Receive:

  • A detailed profiling report identifying the root causes of latency (CPU, memory, I/O, or contention)
  • A diagnosis of critical bottlenecks, quantified and prioritized by impact
  • A technical roadmap with projected speedups (e.g., "615× via vectorization," "5.5× via Rust rewrite")
  • A fixed-price SOW and timeline for the Phase 2 implementation

Pricing: Fixed Fee: €3,500

Phase 2 icon
Phase 2

Surgical Optimization

Targeted rewriting of critical paths - We replace your bottlenecks with high-performance code without disrupting your existing system.

Deliverables:

  • Optimized code with an identical API (a guaranteed drop-in replacement)
  • A full validation suite (rigorous numerical parity tests + performance benchmarks)
  • Technical documentation and deployment guide
  • Knowledge transfer to your team (via code review and mentoring)

Technologies (as required):

  • Vectorization: Polars, NumPy (via Numba/JIT)
  • Native Rewrites: Rust + PyO3
  • GPU Acceleration: CuPy, Numba
  • Parallelism: Rayon, Multiprocessing
  • Algorithmic / Data Structures: FFT optimization (realfft), cache-conscious data structures (ring buffers, bitsets)

Pricing: Fixed SOW (Statement of Work) defined post-audit

Ready to identify your bottlenecks?

Book a 30-minute discovery call to discuss your specific performance challenges.

Book a performance audit

Verify the gains. Every case study is reproducible.

Four independent, isolated projects. Each includes correctness tests, performance benchmarks, and full documentation. All results are reproducible on your own hardware.

Pandas to Polars migration
Case Study 01

Pandas vs. Polars – Backtest Vectorization

Migrating a loop-based quantitative backtest from O(T×W×N) to fully vectorized O(T×N) using Polars + NumPy hybrid.

  • 46–615× speedup across dataset sizes (SMALL: 500×10, LARGE: 3000×100)
  • 19% lower Python memory allocations (tracemalloc) on large datasets
  • Numerical parity: returns match at ~1e-12, equity drift within ~6e-8
  • Polars for Rust-based rolling windows, NumPy for matrix operations
HFT orderbook optimization
Case Study 02

HFT L2 Orderbook – Ring Buffer + Bitset

Replacing HashMap-based orderbook with cache-optimized ring buffers and bitsets in Rust for sub-nanosecond read latencies.

  • 5.5× faster updates: 242 ns vs 1.338 µs (HashMap baseline)
  • 175–560× faster reads: 0.53–0.90 ns vs 147–310 ns for best bid/ask
  • ~86% less CPU
  • L1 cache residency: ~34 KB hot set, zero heap allocations in hot path
FFT autocorrelation optimization
Case Study 03

FFT Autocorrelation – Rust + PyO3

Drop-in Rust replacement for SciPy's FFT-based autocorrelation with adaptive algorithm selection and zero-allocation hot paths.

  • 70× speedup (small datasets: n=100, k=50)
  • 2.6–9.7× speedup (large datasets: n=10K, k=50–500)
  • Numerical accuracy: max difference <1×10⁻⁸ vs SciPy
  • FFT plan caching, thread-local buffer pools, 2357-smooth FFT sizing
GPU Monte Carlo optimization
Case Study 04

GPU Monte Carlo – NumPy → CuPy

Offloading Monte Carlo simulation for Asian option pricing from CPU (NumPy) to GPU (CuPy) with drop-in API replacement.

  • 13.7× speedup (standard GPU, 500K paths × 252 steps)
  • 42.0× speedup with zero-copy architecture (eliminates 156ms transfer time)
  • Float32 is 1.81× faster than float64 on GPU
  • Drop-in replacement: import numpy → import cupy

Ready to stop leaving alpha on the table?

Every hour your backtest runs is an hour your quants can't iterate. Every millisecond of latency is lost edge. Book a performance audit to quantify exactly where your code is slow—and how fast it could be.

What happens next:

  1. 1
    Technical Discovery

    30-minute call to understand your stack and bottlenecks

  2. 2
    Profiling Engagement

    Flat fee from EUR 3,000

  3. 3
    Detailed Report

    Top 3 bottlenecks, projected speedups, implementation roadmap

  4. 4
    Decide Next Steps

    Proceed with Phase 2 optimization (pricing defined post-audit)

Contact: frenchquant125@gmail.com

Schedule instantly or email to discuss your specific use case.